Mental vs. Top-Down Causation: Sic et Non
- Date: 07/15/2013
- Occasion: Biola University's Center for Christian Thought May 2013 conference, "Neuroscience and the Soul." This presentation was delivered on May 18, 2013.
- Media Type: Streaming Video
- Audience: Advanced
- Kingdom Categories: Life of the Mind
Many think that top-down causation is essential for preserving the causal efficacy of the mental. Thus, Nancey Murphy claims that top-down causation is crucial for avoiding causal reduction and, accordingly, leaving room for mental causation and responsible agency.
Now it seems to me that the causal efficacy of the self and its various mental states is correct. Indeed, I believe that this is a properly basic belief grounded in (defeasible) knowledge by acquaintance with the self’s and its mental states’ causal activities. But I am not so sanguine about top-down causation, at least when it is located against a certain metaphysical framework to be mentioned below. When properly interpreted, I do not believe there are any clear examples of it, and I think there is a persuasive case against top-down causation.
In order to clarify and defend these claims in this presentation, first, I lay out two preliminary considerations relevant to what follows; second, show why I do not believe alleged examples of top-down causation are convincing in a way that is pertinent to mental causation; third, present a case for why there is no top-down mental causation; fourth, suggest an important option for moving forward in preserving what we all know to be the case—that mental causation is real.
My presentation lasts for about 40 minutes and then it is followed by a response from philosopher Robin Collins.
Related Content: If this video presentation interests you, you might also want to consider the following:
- "What is the Soul and is it Real?" (audio)
- "Naturalism, the Crisis of the Soul, and the Affects on Culture" (audio)
- "Brief Reflection on Neuroscience and the Soul" (article)
- "Conceptualist Argument for a Spiritual Substantial Soul" (article)
- "Bioethics, Substance Dualism and the Argument from Self-Awareness" (article)
- "Oppy on the Argument from Consciousness: A Rejoinder" (article)
- "Restoring the Substance to the Soul of Psychology" (article)
- "Intelligent Design Psychology and Evolutionary Psychology: A Comparison of Rival Paradigms" (article)
- "Intelligent Design Psychology and Evolutionary Psychology on Consciousness: Turning Water Into Wine" (article)
- Consciousness and the Existence of God (book)
- The Recalcitrant Imago Dei (book)
- Body & Soul (book)
- Christian Perspectives on Being Human (book)
- It advances work at the intersection of philosophy of mind and metaphysics.
- It expands work done in Consciousness and the Existence of God and the Recalcitrant Imago Dei
- It offers a critique of a physicalist assumptions regarding top-down causation and reductionism.