by J.P. Moreland
- Title: Was Husserl a Nominalist?
- Date: June 1989
- Source: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49:4 (June 1989): 661-674.
- Article Type: Journal Article
- Audience: Advanced
- Kingdom Categories: Life of the Mind
Generally speaking, students of Edmund Husserl are divided when it comes to stating his theory of universals. Was Husserl a realist or a nominalist?
The purpose of this article is to argue that Husserl was a realist. There are a number of issues relevant to proving this point. But in my opinion, the most important issue in the debate about Husserl's view of universals is his doctrine of moments. By focusing on different ways of assaying a Husserlian moment, the main issues in the realist/nominalist debate will become clear and, I hope, the strength of the realist case will be enhanced.
Related Content: If this article interests you, you might also want to consider the following:
- "Naturalism, Nominalism, and Husserlian Moments" (article)
- Universals (book)
- Naturalism (book)
- Philosophical Foundations For A Christian Worldview (book)
- Consciousness and the Existence of God (book)
- The Recalcitrant Imago Dei (book)
- Body and Soul (book)
- Christian Perspectives on Being Human (book)
- It offers a defense of Husserlian realism.
- It is a helpful case study in ontology.
- It explicates "Husserlian moments."
Comment With Care